XU Bokai , WEN Juan, SUN Manli , GUO Qinglin , MA Qian , HU Junjian
2023, 2(1):
25-32.
By taking the original soil in cave 80 at the Maijishan Grottoes as a target sample,and by using soil from selected locations in the areas surrounding the cave temples as contrast samples,this study analyzes the degree of difference between the two sample groups by analyzing the mineral composition,chroma,granularity and soluble salt content of the different soils. The results show that the difference in mineral composition between the two sample groups is small (8.2%), but the differences in color and grain size are large (3.1 and 17.8%). Compared with the original earth in the cave,the mineral composition of the earth taken from selected locations fluctuates greatly (6.6%~27.9% ),while differences in chromaticity are moderate (1.6~1.9 with a specific value of 4.7),the difference in grain size is relatively concentrated (13.3%~16.2%),and the soluble salt content is consistently less than 1% . The selection of soil from local sites is not entirely applicable,however,as thedifferences between the earth taken from various places fluctuates greatly. Generally speaking,the soil to be used in the restoration of cave temple murals should be selected from samples that are most similar to the original earth of the cave,as determined through laboratory analysis;a second principle for selection is that the use of “local materials” from adjacent areas is likely to provide the best soil available. This research recommends using soil from Xiaqu for the restoration of cave 80 at the Maijishan Grottoes,as comparative analysis of the two soil groups has confirmed that the composition of the earth from this location is quite similar to that of the cave.